ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF VANILLIN AND QUERCETIN ON THE DEGREE OF FEED DIGESTABILITY AND THE RUMEN MICROBIOME OF CATTLE

Keywords: cattle, rumen, feeding, vanillin, quercetin, digestibility, microbiome

Abstract

Background. There are various ways to modulate rumen microbial diversity of ruminants, one of which is the use of feed additives. The inclusion of phytochemicals in the diet leads to changes in the rumen microbiome and the dynamics of fermentation in it, which has a positive effect on the productive qualities of farm animals.

The goal of the study was to evaluate the effect of vanillin and quercetin on the degree of digestibility of feed and the microbiome of the rumen of cattle.

Materials and methods. Object of study: rumen contents of Kazakh white-headed bull calves. Phytochemicals used: vanillin at a concentration of 2,45×10-4 mol/l (test sample I) and quercetin at a concentration of 4,90×10-4 mol/l (test sample II). Experiments to assess the digestibility of dry matter of the feed substance were carried out using a Daisy D200I incubator (Ankom Technology, USA) in vitro (an artificial rumen model). Sequencing of the DNA library of 16S-rRNA genes was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, USA). The taxonomic composition of rumen fluid was determined based on the NCBI database и Genome taxonomy database (GTDB).

Results. During the research, it was found that the addition of vanillin and quercetin leads to an increase in the digestibility of the feed substrate by 1,25% and 2,71% relative to the control sample. When studying the microbial diversity of cattle rumen fluid at the phylum level, 6 taxa were identified in the control sample: Actinomycetota, Bacillota, Bacteroidota, Fusobacteriota, Patescibacteriota and Pseudomonadota, while the dominant position was occupied by bacteria of the phylum Bacillota (41,76%), Pseudomonadota (36,82%) and Bacteroidota (9,29%). After incubation of rumen fluid with small molecules of plant origin, a significant increase in the number of representatives of the phylum Bacillota and a decrease in the number of bacteria belonging to the phylum Bacteroidota and Pseudomonadota were recorded. The structure of the bacterial community in all test samples was enriched with representatives of the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio (phylum Bacillota, class Clostridia, family Lachnospiraceae).

​Conclusion. The results obtained provide the basis for formulating diets for cattle with the inclusion of vanillin and quercetin, which help improve the digestibility of dry matter of the feed substrate and change the microbial diversity of the rumen, which together can have a positive effect on the productive qualities of farm animals.

EDN: BTYGUO

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ludmila V. Vlasenko, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Researcher, Laboratory of Breeding and Genetic Research in Animal Husbandry

Kseniya N. Atlanderova, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Researcher, Testing Centre

Galimzhan K. Duskaev, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor RAS, Leading Researcher, Department of Feeding for Farm Animals and Feed Technology named after S.G. Leushin

References

Дускаев Г.К., Власенко Л.В., Косян Д.Б., Курилкина М.Я. Влияние малых молекул растительного происхождения на микробное разнообразие слепого отдела кишечника цыплят-бройлеров // Птицеводство. 2023. № 4. С. 6-51. https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2023-72-4-46-51 (Duskaev G.K., Vlasenko L.V., Kosyan D.B., Kurilkina M.Ya. The effect of small molecules of plant origin on the cecal microbial diversity in broilers. Ptitsevodstvo, 2023, no. 4, pp. 46-51. https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2023-72-4-46-51)

Abecia L., Jiménez E., Martínez-Fernandez G., Martín-García A.I., Ramos-Morales E., Pinloche E., Denman S.E., Newbold C.J., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R. Natural and artificial feeding management before weaning promote different rumen microbial colonization but not differences in gene expression levels at the rumen epithelium of newborn goats. PLOS One, 2017, vol. 12, no. 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182235

Aguerre M.J., Capozzolo M.C., Lencioni P., Cabral C., Wattiaux M.A. Effect of quebracho-chestnut tannin extracts at 2 dietary crude protein levels on performance, rumen fermentation, and nitrogen partitioning in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2016, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 4476-4486. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10745

Atlanderova K., Makaeva A., Miroshnikov S., Duskaev G. Change In The Taxonomic Composition Of Ruminal Microflora Against The Background Of Copper And Plant Extract. Journal of Animal Science, 2021, vol. 99, no. S3, pp. 235-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.430

Benchaar C., Calsamiglia S., Chaves A.V., Fraser G.R., Colombatto D., Mcallister T.A., Beauchemin K.A. A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2008, vol. 145, no. 1-4, pp. 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.014

Bodas R., Prieto N., Garcia-Gonzalez R., Andres S., Giraldez F.J., Lopez S. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 176, pp. 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010

Calsamiglia S., Busquet M., Cardozo P., Castillejos L., Ferret A. Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy Sci., 2007, vol. 90, pp. 2580-2595. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-644

Chuang S-T., Ho S-T., Tu P-W., Li K-Y., Kuo Y-L., Shiu J-S., Wang S-Y., Chen M-J. The Rumen Specific Bacteriome in Dry Dairy Cows and Its Possible Relationship with Phenotypes. Animals (Basel), 2020, vol. 10, no. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101791

Hassan F., Arshad M.A., Ebeid H.M., Rehman M.S., Khan M.S., Shahid S., Yang C. Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction. Front Vet Sci., 2020, vol. 7, pp. 575801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575801

Henderson G., Cox F., Ganesh S., Jonker A., Young W., Global Rumen Census Collaborators, Janssen P.H. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep., 2015, vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567

Lillehoj H., Liu Y, Calsamiglia S., Fernandez-Miyakawa M.E., Chi F., Cravens R.L., Oh S., Gay C.G. Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Vet Res., 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6

Malmuthuge N., Guan L.L. Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 2017, vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0135-3

Min Y.W., Rhee P-L. The role of microbiota on the gut immunology. Clin. Ther., 2015, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 968-975. tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.009

O'Hara E., Neves A.L.A., Song Y., Guan L.L. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Cattle Production and Health: Driver or Passenger? Annu Rev Anim Biosci., 2020, vol. 8, pp. 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083952

Ornaghi M., Prado R.M., Ramos T.R., Catalano F.R., Mottin C., Creevey C.J., Huws S.A., Prado I.N. Natural plant-based additives can improve ruminant performance by influencing the rumen microbiome. Research square, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-29748/v1

Ozbayram E.G., Ince O., Ince B., Harms H., Kleinsteuber S. Comparison of Rumen and Manure Microbiomes and Implications for the Inoculation of Anaerobic Digesters. Microorganisms, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6010015

Patel D.D., Patel A.K., Parmar N.R. Shah M.T., Patel J.B., Pandya P.R., Joshi C.G. Microbial and carbohydrate active enzyme profile of buffalo rumen metagenome and their alteration in response to variation in the diet. Gene, 2014, vol. 545, pp. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.003

Tong J., Zhang H., Yang D., Zhang Y., Xiong B., Jiang L. Illumina sequencing analysis of the ruminal microbiota in high-yield and low-yield lactating dairy cows. PLoS One, 2018, vol. 13, no. 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198225

Torres Manno M.A., Gizzi F.O., Martin M., Espariz M., Magni C., Blancato S.V. Metagenomic approach to infer rumen microbiome derived traits of cattle. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2023, vol. 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03694-1

Vlasenko L., Atlanderova K. Assessment (in vitro) toxicity of small molecules of plant origin. E3S Web of Conf. VIII International Conference on Advanced Agritechnologies, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Development (AGRITECH-VIII 2023), 2023, vol. 390. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339007022

Wallace R.J., Chaudhary L.C., McKain N., McEwan N.R., Richardson A.J., Vercoe P.E., Walker N.D., Paillard D. Clostridium proteoclasticum: A ruminal bacterium that forms stearic acid from linoleic acid. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 2006, vol. 265, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00487.x

Xue M., Sun H., Wu X., Guan L.L., Liu J. Assessment of Rumen Microbiota from a Large Dairy Cattle Cohort Reveals the Pan and Core Bacteriomes Contributing to Varied Phenotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol., 2018, vol. 84, no. 19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00970-18

Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., Abecia L., Newbold C.J. Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review. Front. Microbiol., 2015, vol. 6, pp. 1133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133

Abstract views: 233

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Vlasenko, L., Atlanderova, K., & Duskaev, G. (2024). ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF VANILLIN AND QUERCETIN ON THE DEGREE OF FEED DIGESTABILITY AND THE RUMEN MICROBIOME OF CATTLE. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 16(6), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2024-16-6-1013
Section
Human and Animal Physiology