TO THE ISSUE OF INDICATORS OF BIOLOGICALLY VALUABLE FORESTS IN PROTECTED AREAS

  • Angelika A. Gaivoronslaya Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky
  • Marina V. Dolganova Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky
  • Vladimir T. Demikhov Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky
  • Olga N. Chigrai Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky
  • Dmitry I. Chuchin Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky
Keywords: forest communities, protected natural areas, biologically valuable forests, indicator indicators, Bryansk region

Abstract

Background. Work on biomonitoring of biologically valuable forests, including those belonging to the international category of «forests of high conservation value», is relevant, especially in the old developed region, and is also poorly studied in terms of monitoring. The work summarizes the diagnostic characteristics of model forest objects, united by a single protection regime, forest management, heterogeneous in elements, largely subjected to transformations and having diverse homeostatic potential for identifying indicator indicators of forest «safety», i.e. to solve the problem of local forest areas with a minimum buffer zone.

The purpose of the article is to establish the presence of indicative biodiagnostic features in forest biocenoses in protected areas for assessment activities and management of the development of valuable communities in the Bryansk region.

Materials and methods. When surveying forest biocenoses (first stage 2015, second 2022-2023) in six protected areas, in the tracts of a large city, route, geobotanical, coenopopulation methods were used, the Simpson index was calculated, and reforestation was identified.

Results. The results were revealed: the greatest species diversity was revealed for tall grass spruce forests in small areas of the natural monument «Ryzhukha Swamp» (Navlinsky district). Unique communities - swampy pine forests, black alder forests with high species diversity (Simpson diversity index = 20.2) are described in the «Petrovskoe Swamp» forests (Mglinsky district). All model forest biocenoses under study have elements (groups) of biologically valuable forests. Polydominant spruce forests of the Navlinsky district, as a refugium of unique, including narrowly tolerant species, are recommended for inclusion in the regional Green Book. Forests and swampy forests of the «Petrovskoe Swamp» are subject to the least transformation from stress factors. Urban forests of varying degrees of transformation - old-growth stands of pine in the forest sheds tract, oak forests, their derivatives, black alder forests of the Zastavische tract - have the lowest indicators of the Simpson diversity index, a simplification of species composition and spatial structure - vertical and horizontal - are noted. All urban forests, however, play a significant environment-forming and recreational role. Analysis of phytocenotic (ecological-botanical) elements of the flora showed that in the forest areas of cities there is no «surge» of invasive species, but the transition from one ecological-botanical group to another is clearly identified. Thus, the ability to maintain homeostasis is preserved. The smallest participation of advents in the composition of local floras is represented in the protected areas «Orlovskie Dvoriki» (2%) and «Petrovskoe Swamp » (3%).

Conclusion. The conducted research made it possible to establish priority risk factors for forest biogeocenoses: insufficient area for the protection and reproduction of forests; recreation and location in developed areas; lack of a buffer zone necessary for the conservation and reproduction of edificatory species; introduction of adventive species into forest biogeocenoses and their naturalization; A special risk factor is the fragmentation of the territory and, as a consequence, the mosaic nature of plant communities, including the replacement of standard (quasi-native) communities with derivative, oligodominant ones. Thus, the ratio of ecological and botanical groups in the local flora of the forest areas under study serves as a good indicator of the preservation of forest biogeocenoses or the presence of stress load - recreational digression. It is also recommended to use the Simpson index and α-diversity indicators to indicate the «safety» of forest biocenoses.

EDN: ETNKPM

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Angelika A. Gaivoronslaya, Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky

Graduate Student of the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management

Marina V. Dolganova, Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management

Vladimir T. Demikhov, Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management

Olga N. Chigrai, Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management

Dmitry I. Chuchin, Bryansk State University named after Academician I.G. Petrovsky

Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management

References

Список литературы

Браславская Т.Ю. О природоохранной ценности восточноевропейских широколиственных лесов // Вестник Тверского госуниверситета. Сер. «Биология и экология». 2017. № 2. С. 278-286.

Гайворонская А.А. Характеристика лесных сообществ по элементам биоразнообразия на примере охраняемой территории памятника природы «Орловские Дворики» Брянской области // Индикация состояния окружающей среды: теория, практика, образование: труды восьмой междунар. науч.-практ. конф. 2022. С. 92-95.

Ершов Д.В., Гаврилюк Е.А., Тихонова Е.В., Браславская Т.Ю. и др. Вероятностная оценка распределения ключевых биотопов в лесах национального парка «Смоленское Поозерье» на основе спутниковых и топографических данных // Лесоведение. 2020. № 1. С. 17-34.

Зелёная книга Брянской области (растительные сообщества, нуждающиеся в охране): монография / А.Д. Булохов, Ю.А. Семенищенков, Н.Н. Панасенко, Л.Н. Анищенко, Е.А. Аверинова и др. Брянск: ГУП «Брянск. обл. полиграф. объединение», 2012. 142 с.

Лесной кодекс Российской Федерации. ФЗ от 04.12.2006. № 200-ФЗ. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64299/51c4b14ed452e52608b1ffa7d322b7f1ceca7a76/

Малежик Е.Е., Анищенко Л.Н. Показатели биоразнообразия городских лесов города Брянска // Геоэкологические проблемы современности и пути их решения: матер. I Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, посвященной 100-летию Орловского государственного университета имени И.С. Тургенева (23 мая 2019 г., г. Орёл). Орёл: ОГУ имени И.С. Тургенева», 2019. С. 41-50.

Мэгарран Э. Экологическое разнообразие и его измерение. М., 1992. 182 с.

Природные ресурсы и окружающая среда субъектов Российской Федерации. Центральный Федеральный округ: Брянская область / Под ред. Н. Г. Рыбальского, Е. Д. Самотесова и А. Г. Митюкова. М.: НИА – Природа, 2007. 1144 с.

Постановление администрации Брянской области от 24 октября 2010 г. № 755 «Об утверждении положений и паспортов особо охраняемых природных территорий в Брянском, Гордеевском, Дятьковском, Злынковском, Карачевском, Климовском, Клинцовском, Комаричском, Красногорском, Навлинском, Новозыбковском, Почепском, Рогнединском, Севском, Стародубском, Суражском, Унечском районах Брянской области». 2010. https://base.garant.ru/24311692/

Савиных Н.П., Шабалкина С.В., Пересторонина О.Н. Особенности выделения высоких природоохранных ценностей типа «Редкие экосистемы и местообитания» для сертификации лесов Кировской области // Теоретическая и прикладная экология. 2021. № 2. С. 229-234.

Яницкая Т. Практическое руководство по выделению лесов высокой природоохранной ценности в России // Всемирный фонд природы. М., 2008. 136 с.

Borghi C., Francini S., McRoberts R.E., Parisi F.,·Lombardi F., Susanna Nocentini S., Maltoni A., Travaglini D., Chirici G. Country wide assessment of biodiversity, naturalness and old growth status using national forest inventory data // European Journal of Forest Research. 2024. Vol. 143. P. 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01620-6

Ceccherini G., Duveiller G., Grassi G., Lemoine G., Avitabile V., Pilli R., et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after (2015) // Nature. 2020. Vol. 83. Р. 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2438-y

Curtis P. G., Slay C. M., Harris N. L., Tyukavina A., Hansen M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss // Science. 2018. №361. Р. 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445

De Meo I, Becagli C, Casagli A, Paletto A. Characteristics of deadwood and implications for biodiversity in Douglas fr (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco) planted forests in Italy // Trees for People. 2020. Vol. 10, 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100341

Ette J-S, Sallmannshofer M, Geburek T. Assessing forest biodiversity: a novel index to consider ecosystem, species, and genetic diversity // Forests. 2023. Vol. 14, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040709

Larrieu L, Courbaud B, Drénou C et al. Key factors determining the presence of tree-related microhabitats: a synthesis of potential factors at site, stand and tree scales, with perspectives for further research // For Ecol Manage. 2022. Vol. 515, 120235. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120235

Marini L., Bartomeus, I., Rader, R., and Lami, F. Species–habitat networks: a tool to improve landscape management for conservation // J. Appl. Ecol. 2019. Vol. 56. P. 923–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13337

Mikusiński G., Bubnicki J., Gunnar B., Svensson J. Strengthening the Network of High Conservation Value Forests in Boreal Landscapes // Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020. Vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.595730

Svensson J., Bubnicki J. W., Jonsson B.-G., Andersson J., Mikusiński G. Conservation significance of intact forest landscapes in the Scandinavian mountains green belt // Landscape Ecol. 2020. №35. Р. 2113–2131. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4

Ward M., et al. Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land // Nature communications. 2020. № 11. Р. 1-10. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-020-18457-x

Watson J.E.M., et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems // Nat Ecol Evol. 2018. № 2. Р. 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x

References

Braslavskaya T.Y. On the conservation value of Eastern European broad-leaved forests. Bulletin of Tver State University. Ser. “Biology and ecology”, 2017, no. 2, pp. 278-286.

Gaivoronskaya A.A. Characterization of forest communities by elements of biodiversity on the example of the protected area of the natural monument “Orlovskie Dvoriki” of Bryansk region. Environmental Indication: theory, practice, education: Proceedings of the eighth international scientific and practical conference. 2022, pp. 92-95.

Ershov D.V., Gavrilyuk E.A., Tikhonova E.V., Braslavskaya T.Yu. et al. Probabilistic assessment of the distribution of key habitats in the forests of the national park “Smolensk Lakeland” based on satellite and topographic data. Forest Science, 2020, no. 1, pp. 17-34.

Green Book of Bryansk region (plant communities in need of protection): monograph / A.D. Bulokhov, Y.A. Semenishchenkov, N.N. Panasenko, L.N. Anishchenko, E.A. Averinova et al. Bryansk: Bryansk Regional Polygraphic Association, 2012, 142 p.

Forest Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Law of 04.12.2006. No. 200-FZ. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64299/51c4b14ed452e52608b1ffa7d322b7f1ceca7a76/

Malezhik E.E., Anishchenko L.N. Biodiversity indicators of urban forests of the city of Bryansk. Geoecological problems of modernity and ways of their solution: mater. I All-Russian scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of I.S. Turgenev Oryol State University (May 23, 2019, Oryol). Oryol: OGU, 2019, pp. 41-50.

Magarran E. Ecological diversity and its measurement. М., 1992, 182 p.

Natural Resources and Environment of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Central Federal District: Bryansk Oblast / Edited by N. G. Rybalsky, E. D. Samotesov and A. G. Mityukov. Moscow: NIA-Priroda, 2007, 1144 p.

Resolution of the Bryansk Oblast Administration of October 24, 2010, No. 755 “On Approval of the Regulations and Passports of Specially Protected Natural Areas in the Bryansk, Gordeevsky, Dyatkovsky, Zlynkovsky, Karachevsky, Klimovsky, Klintsovsky, Komarichsky, Krasnogorsky, Navlinsky, Novozybkovsky, Pochepsky, Rognedinsky, Sevsky, Starodubsky, Surazhsky, Unechsky Districts of the Bryansk Oblast”. 2010. https://base.garant.ru/24311692/.

Savinykh N.P., Shabalkina S.V., Perestoronina O.N. Features of the allocation of high conservation values of the type “Rare ecosystems and habitats” for the certification of forests of the Kirov region. Theoretical and Applied Ecology, 2021, no. 2, pp. 229-234.

Yanitskaya T. Practical Guide to the Allocation of High Conservation Value Forests in Russia. World Wide Fund for Nature. М., 2008, 136 p.

Borghi C., Francini S., McRoberts R.E., Parisi F.,·Lombardi F., Susanna Nocentini S., Maltoni A., Travaglini D., Chirici G. Country wide assessment of biodiversity, naturalness and old growth status using national forest inventory data. European Journal of Forest Research, 2024, vol. 143, pp. 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01620-6

Ceccherini G., Duveiller G., Grassi G., Lemoine G., Avitabile V., Pilli R., et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after (2015). Nature, 2020, vol. 83, pp. 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2438-y

Curtis P. G., Slay C. M., Harris N. L., Tyukavina A., Hansen M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science, 2018, no. 361, pp. 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445

De Meo I, Becagli C, Casagli A, Paletto A. Characteristics of deadwood and implications for biodiversity in Douglas fr (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco) planted forests in Italy. Trees for People, 2020, vol. 10, 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100341

Ette J-S, Sallmannshofer M, Geburek T. Assessing forest biodiversity: a novel index to consider ecosystem, species, and genetic diversity. Forests, 2023, vol. 14, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040709

Larrieu L, Courbaud B, Drénou C et al. Key factors determining the presence of tree-related microhabitats: a synthesis of potential factors at site, stand and tree scales, with perspectives for further research. For Ecol Manage, 2022, vol. 515, 120235. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120235

Marini L., Bartomeus, I., Rader, R., and Lami, F. Species–habitat networks: a tool to improve landscape management for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol., 2019, vol. 56, pp. 923–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13337

Mikusiński G., Bubnicki J., Gunnar B., Svensson J. Strengthening the Network of High Conservation Value Forests in Boreal Landscapes. Front. Ecol. Evol., 2020, vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.595730

Svensson J., Bubnicki J. W., Jonsson B.-G., Andersson J., Mikusiński G. Conservation significance of intact forest landscapes in the Scandinavian mountains green belt. Landscape Ecol., 2020, no. 35, pp. 2113–2131. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4

Ward M., et al. Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land. Nature communications, 2020, no. 11, pp. 1-10. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-020-18457-x

Watson J.E.M., et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol., 2018, no. 2, pp. 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x

Abstract views: 328

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Gaivoronslaya, A., Dolganova, M., Demikhov, V., Chigrai, O., & Chuchin, D. (2024). TO THE ISSUE OF INDICATORS OF BIOLOGICALLY VALUABLE FORESTS IN PROTECTED AREAS. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 16(6), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2024-16-6-1017
Section
Ecology, Soil Science and Nature Management