RETRACTED ARTICLE November 29, 2021: ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY PROTECTIVE AFFORESTATION IN THE ARID ZONED
Abstract
The article is devoted to the actualization of the problem of development and increasing the economic efficiency of protective afforestation.
Purpose. Develop proposals for technology to improve the effectiveness of protective afforestation in the arid regions of Russia.
Materials and methods. To describe the species composition, their condition and economic efficiency, we used methods for assessing and predicting the state of plantings according to E. G. Mozolevskaya and methods of forest taxation by O. I. Baboshko. The basis for calculating the costs per 1 ha of windbreak and flow-regulating forest strips was the current calculation and technological maps for protective afforestation. To switch to modern prices, we used the indices of changes in the estimated cost of construction and installation works.
Results. The paper presents the optimal bioengineering parameters of windbreak and flow-regulating forest strips systems in relation to different natural zones of the South of Russia, the level of erosion hazard and the state of the soil cover of slope lands, the size and biogeographic patterns of the cost dynamics for their creation. The range of trees and shrubs used for protective afforestation in arid regions is presented based on the analysis of the hydrophysical and hydrochemical properties of tree species, which allows to increase the biological stability of plantings, increase their life span, and therefore more fully perform their protective functions.
Conclusion. It is established that in deflation-hazardous areas, the capital intensity of arable land management by the system of windbreak forest strips is strictly dependent on the quality of soil and climatic conditions (natural zone), the selected level of protective forest cover and bioengineering features of plantings. In erosion-hazardous areas, investments in the creation of systems of flow-regulating forest strips on arable land are mainly due to the slope of the terrain and the degree of soil washout.
The use of the above calculations and regularities will increase the economic feasibility of capital investments in the planning and design of forest reclamation activities on arable land in the problem regions of the south of Russia.
Downloads
References
Baboshko O. I. Dendrometriya: kurs lektsiy dlya studentov napravleniya «Landshaftnaya arkhitektura» [Dendrometry: a course of lectures for students of the direction “Landscape architecture”]. Novocherkassk, 2014. 77 p.
Vasil’ev Yu. I. Effektivnost’ sistem lesnykh polos v bor’be s deflyatsiey pochv [Effectiveness of forest strip systems in combating soil deflation]. Volgograd: VNIALMI, 2003. 176 p.
Doklad o sostoyanii okruzhayushchey sredy Volgogradskoy oblasti v 2008 godu [Report on the state of the environment of the Volgograd region in 2008]. Volgograd: Panorama, 2009. 384 p.
Sochilova E.N., Surkov N.B., Ershov D.B., Egorov B.A., Bartalev S.S., Bartalev S.A. Kartografirovanie klassov boniteta lesov Primorskogo kraya na osnove sputnikovykh izobrazheniy i dannykh o kharakteristikakh rel’efa [Mapping of forest bonus classes in Primorsky Krai based on satellite images and data on terrain characteristics]. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa [Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from space], 2018, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 96-109. https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-5-96-109
Koval’ Yu.N. Lesnye pozhary na territorii Ermakovskogo munitsipal’nogo rayona Krasnoyarskogo kraya v 2018 godu [Forest fires in the territory of the Ermakovsky Municipal District of the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2018]. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 2020, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 42-52. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2020-12-5-42-52
Kulik K.N., Pugacheva A.N. Struktura rastitel’nykh soobshchestv zalezhnykh zemel’ v sisteme kurtinnykh zashchitnykh lesnykh nasazhdeniy v sukhikh stepyakh [Structure of fallow land plant communities in the system of curtin protective forest stands in dry steppes]. Aridnye ekosistemy [Arid ecosystems], 2016. vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 77-85.
Manaenkov A.S., Korneeva E.A. Metodologiya i rezul’taty otsenki effektivnosti kapital’nykh vlozheniy v lesomelioratsiyu sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zemel’ [Manaenkov A. S., Korneeva E. A. Methodology and results of evaluating the effectiveness of capital investments in forest reclamation of agricultural land]. Regional’naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii [Regional economy. South of Russia], 2012, no. 13, pp. 470-476.
Manaenkov A.S., Korneeva E.A. Ekologo-ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ lesnoy melioratsii sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zemel’ Nizhnego Povolzh’ya [Manaenkov A. S., Korneeva E. A. Ecological and economic efficiency of forest reclamation of agricultural lands of the Lower Volga region]. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshego profesional obrazovanie, 2014, no. 4 (36), pp. 197-202.
Kulik K.N., Pavlovskiy E.S., Rulev A.S., Yuferev V.G. et al. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po landshaftno-ekologicheskomu profilirovaniyu pri agrolesomeliorativnom kartografirovanii [Guidelines for landscape and ecological profiling in agroforestry mapping]. Moscow: Rossel’khozakademiya, 2007, 42 p.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po ekonomicheskoy otsenke lesov [Methodological recommendations for the economic assessment of forests]. Moscow, 1976, 33 p.
Mozolevskaya E. G. Metody otsenki i prognoza dinamiki sostoyanii nasadeniy [Methods of estimation and forecast of the dynamics of the state of plantings]. Lesnoe khozyaystvo [Forestry], 1998, no. 3, pp. 43-45
Nesvat A.P., Rodimtseva A.V., Babenysheva N.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya zashchitnogo lesorazvedeniya [Current state and prospects for the development of protective afforestation]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Orenburg State Agrarian University], 2011, no. 2, pp. 15–17.
Pavlovskiy E.S., Kargan A.V. Spravochnik po agrolesomeliorativnomu ustroystvu [Handbook of agroforestry management]. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost’, 1977, 152 p.
Paulyukyavichus G.B. Rol’ lesa v ekologicheskoy stabilizatsii landshaftov [The role of forests in the ecological stabilization of landscapes]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. 215 p.
Kulik K.N., Manaenkov A.S., Rakov A.Yu. et al. Polezashchitnoe lesorazvedenie: znachenie, sostoyanie, puti vykhoda iz krizisa [Forest protection afforestation: significance, status, ways out of the crisis]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii sel’skokhozyaystvennykh nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences], 2012, no. 1, pp. 24-27.
Rulev A.S. Landshaftno-geograficheskiy podkhod v agrolesomelioratsii [Landscape-geographical approach in agroforestry]. Volgograd: VNIALMI, 2007, 160 p.
Rulev A.S., Pugacheva A.M. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty nelineynoy agrolesomelioratsii subaridnykh landshaftov [Theoretical and applied aspects of nonlinear agroforestry of subarid landscapes]. Lesovedenie, 2018, no. 5, pp. 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0024114818040101
Rulev A.S., Kosheleva O.Yu., Shinkarenko S.S. Geomorfologicheskie kriterii provedeniya lesomelioratsii landshaftov (na primere Priel’ton’ya) [Geomorphological criteria for forest reclamation of landscapes (on the example of the Elton Region)]. Geomorfologiya [Geomorphology], 2017, no. 2, pp. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2017-2-63-71
Suchkov D.K., Ruleva O.V. Landshaftno-geograficheskiy podkhod k otsenke sostoyaniya nasazhdeniy v balke «Otradnoy» [Landscape-geographical approach to the assessment of the state of plantings in the “Otradnaya” ravine»]. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 174-194. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2021-13-1-174-194
Suchkov D.K. Rol’ i ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ zashchitnykh lesnykh nasazhdeniy v vosstanovlenii i preobrazovanii landshaftov [The role and economic efficiency of protective forest stands in the restoration and transformation of landscapes]. Nauchno-agronomicheskiy zhurnal, 2018, no. 1 (102), pp. 20-23.
Sbornik raschetno-tekhnologicheskikh kart na raboty po zashchitnomu lesorazvedeniyu. T. I. Sozdanie polezashchitnykh i vodoreguliruyushchikh lesnykh polos [Collection of calculation and technological maps for work on protective afforestation. T. I. Creation of protective and water-regulating forest strips.]. Moscow: Gosleskhoz, 1985, 268 p.
Strategiya razvitiya zashchitnogo lesorazvedeniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [Strategy for the development of protective afforestation in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020]. Volgograd: VNIALMI, 2008, 34 p.
Tanyukevich V.V. Agrolesomeliorativnoe ustroystvo: kurs lektsiy dlya studentov napravleniya “Landshaftnaya arkhitektura” Novocherkasskogo inzhenerno-meliorativnogo instituta im. A.K. Kortunova (FGBOU VO “Donskoy GAU [Agroforestry device: course of lectures for students of the direction “Landscape architecture” of the Novocherkassk Engineering and Meliorative Institute named after A. K. Kortunov (FGBOU VO “Donskoy GAU]. Novocherkassk, 2014, 87 p.
Timer’yanov A.Sh. Zashchitnye lesnye nasazhdeniya i vosproizvodstvo agrolesnykh landshaftov [Protective forest plantings and reproduction of agroforest landscapes]. Doklady RASKhN [Reports of RASKHN], 2012, no. 6, pp. 47-50.
Tribunskaya V.M. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ ZLN v sisteme okhrany pochv ot erozii [Economic efficiency of ZLN in the system of soil protection from erosion]. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1990, 176 p.
Chupakhin V.M. Osnovy landshaftovedeniya [Osnovy landscape studies]. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1987, 168 p.
Shinkarenko S.S., Solodovnikov D.A., Omarov R.S. Izuchenie i kartografirovanie landshaftov poluostrova Sareptskiy na Nizhney Volge [Izuchenie i kartografirovanie landscapes of the Sareptsky Peninsula on the Lower Volga]. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie [Yug Rossii: ecology, development], 2020, vol. 15, no. 3 (56), pp. 86-96. https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2020-3-86-96
Cherubini F, Santaniello F, Hu X, Sonesson J, Hammer Strømman A, Weslien J, Djupström L.B., Ranius T. Climate impacts of retention forestry in a Swedish boreal pine forest. J Land Use Sci., 2018, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1529831
Fischer J, Meacham M, Queiroz C. A plea for multifunctional landscapes. Front Ecol Environ., 2017, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 59. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1464
Guidelines for Soil Description and Classification Central and Eastern European Students’ Version / M. Switoniak, C. Kabala, A. Karklins. Torun, 2018, 286 p.
Hallinger M., Johansson V., Schmalholz M., Sjöberg S., Ranius T. Factors driving tree mortality in retained forest fragments. For Ecol Manag., 2016. vol. 368, pp. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.023
Laginha Pinto Correia D., Raulier F., Filotas É., Bouchard M. Stand height and cover type complement forest age structure as a biodiversity indicator in boreal and northern temperate forest management. Ecol Indic., 2017, vol. 72, pp. 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.033
Mori A.S., Lertzman K.P., Gustafsson L. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. J Appl Ecol., 2017, vol. 54, pp. 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.1266934
Tanyukevich V.V., Kulik A.V., Domanina O.I., Tyurin S.V., Kvasha A.A. Fires in arid agroforestal landscapes and their damage assessment. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 2019, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.17423/afx.2019.61.2.10
Copyright (c) 2021 Dmitry K. Suchkov, Dmitry K. Suchkov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
