The effect of a probiotic based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens VKPM B‑11475 on the composition of intramuscular fat and the amino acid composition of goat meat protein was studied
Abstract
Background. The article presents the results of an experimental study evaluating the effect of the probiotic strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens VKPM B-11475, used in dosages of 4×10⁹ and 4×10⁷ CFU, on the metabolic profile of Zaanen goats, with an emphasis on the modulation of the composition of volatile fatty acids in intramuscular fat and the amino acid spectrum of muscle protein in the age periods of 8 months and 4 of the year. It was found that probiotic intervention induced a statistically significant modification of lipid metabolism, expressed in an increase in the proportion of saturated fatty acids by 5.22-7.23% (8 months) and 1.62% (4 years), monounsaturated – by 1.14-2.95% and 0.4-2.26%, polyunsaturated – by 0.67-1.53% and 0.46–0.81%, as well as an increase in the level of linoleic acid by 0.83-1.13% and 0.05-0.24%, with a concomitant decrease in the concentration of linolenic acid by 0.19-0.49% and 0.04-0.17%, respectively. The data obtained highlight the potential of B. amyloliquefaciens as a functional additive for targeted correction of the nutritional status of productive animals.
Purpose. To study the effect of the probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the amino acid composition of goat meat
Materials and methods. A probiotic based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens VKPM B-11475 (B. amyloliquefaciens) was produced in the research laboratory of the individual entrepreneur and head of the farm "Tsirulev Evgeny Pavlovich". The preparation is a light-brown liquid with an average concentration of 4×109 CFU. An experimental study was conducted at the goat milk production and processing farm of Semkina O.V. in the Privolzhsky District, Samara Region. Kids were selected as matched pairs, 10 animals per group, at 2 months of age. Three groups of animals, 10 animals each, were created for the experiment. The control group included young kids on a basic feeding ration. Goats in the first experimental group received a probiotic at a dose of 4×109, while those in the second experimental group received 4×107 30 minutes before feeding, one capsule per head once daily for one month, administered using a bolus dispenser. Animals were slaughtered at the age of 8 months. A similar experiment was conducted with animals aged 4 years; they were also given the probiotic annually for 2 months. The experiment examined the effect of the probiotic on the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat (studied using FT-MIR spectroscopy) and the amino acid composition of meat protein (studied using the method described in GOST 34132-2017, method for amino acid analysis).
Results. A significant quality indicator is not only the fat content but also the fatty acid composition of its lipid fraction. Animal fats contain essential polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic and linolenic acids, which play a vital role in metabolic processes. Like essential amino acids, they are not synthesized in the body, or are synthesized to a limited extent. A prolonged lack of polyunsaturated acids in the diet leads to growth retardation, necrotic skin lesions, and changes in capillary permeability.
Conclusion. The use of a probiotic based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens VKPM B-11475 in raising Saanen goats demonstrates a positive effect on the lipid and amino acid composition of meat. In the short term (8 months), an increase in the proportion of saturated fatty acids by 5.22-7.23%, monounsaturated fatty acids by 1.14-2.95%, and polyunsaturated fatty acids by 0.67-1.53% was observed, including an increase in linoleic acid content by 0.83-1.13%, while linolenic acid decreased by 0.19–0.49%. In the long-term experiment (4 years), the changes persist, but are more pronounced: an increase in saturated fatty acids by 1.62%, monounsaturated by 0.4-2.26%, polyunsaturated by 0.46-0.81% and linoleic acid by 0.05-0.24%, as well as a decrease in the content of linolenic acid by 0.04-0.17%.
EDN: JRTKIW
Downloads
References
Kravchenko, A. P., & Vladimirov, N. I. (2021). Evaluation of growth in young dairy goats when introducing the probiotic “Plantarum” into the diet. Bulletin of the Altai State Agricultural University, (5), 79–83. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JEWALI
Luo, Y., Su, L., Su, R., Wang, B., Liu, Ch., & Wang, Zh. (2020). Effects of Astragalus membranaceus supplementation on oxidative stability of Cashmere goat. Food Science & Nutrition, 8(10), 5550–5556. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1786. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IFQGEC
Nazari, P., Farshad, A., Vaziry, A., & Rostamzadeh, J. (2020). Evaluation of pentoxifylline and Basal Medium Eagle supplemented to dilute on cryopreserved goat spermatozoa. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(10), 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13774. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UBAHYU
Yadav, D., Singh, A. K., Kumar, B., Mahla, A. S., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Effect of n 3 PUFA rich fish oil supplementation during late gestation on kidding, uterine involvement and resumption of follicular activity in goat. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 54(12), 1651–1659.
Krasovskaya, T. L., & Novopashina, S. I. (2022). Influence of Humival on nonspecific resistance and survival rate of goat kids and lambs. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Stavropol Research Institute of Animal Husbandry and Forage Production, 2(1), 62–65.
Zubairu, A. Kh., Malakhova, L. S., & Griga, O. E. (2022). Impact of feed additives “LactoMin” and “LaktuVet” on milk productivity of goats. Agricultural Journal, (1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.25930/2687-1254/010.1.15.2022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BYKHIA
Funk, I. A., & Vladimirov, N. I. (2022). Effect of probiotic preparation “Plantarum” on milk productivity and milk quality in goats. Bulletin of the Altai State Agricultural University, (5), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.53083/1996-4277-2022-211-5-56-61. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GPAZTL
Gorlov, I. F., Korotkova, A. A., & Mosolova, N. I. (2013). Efficiency of using the feed additive “IODDAR Zn” and the drug DAFS 25 in dairy goat breeding. Bulletin of the Altai State Agricultural University, (3), 78–82. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWPWTL
Smolentsev, S. Yu. (2023). Sanitary assessment and technological indicators of goat milk when using the feed additive “AlgaVet” in the diet. Veterinary Doctor, (5), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.33632/1998-698X_2023_5_10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YGSOEF
Gorlov, I. F., & Nikolaeva, D. V. (2022). Influence of lactulose containing feed additives on productivity, milk quality indicators, and immune status of goats. Animal Husbandry and Feed Production, 105(4), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-89. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HSYJJE
Skvortsova, E. G., & Filinskaya, O. G. (2020). Growth and development of lambs and goat kids when using the microbiological preparation “Em Kurunga”. Proceedings of the Orenburg State Agrarian University, (3), 325–328. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MRBAHN
Altukhova, O. B., & Semenov, S. N. (2013). Veterinary and sanitary assessment and technological indicators of goat milk against the background of the use of stevia pulp. Veterinary Pathology, (4), 78–82.
Yashkin, A. I., & Vladimirov, N. I. (2022). Milk productivity of lactating Saanen goats when using probiotic preparations. Bulletin of the Altai State Agricultural University, (4), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.53083/1996-4277-2022-210-4-67-72. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PGZLNM
Makar, Z. N., & Cherepanov, G. G. (2018). Formation of substrate balance in the mammary gland and protein production in goats fed a high protein diet with sodium acetate or sodium propionate supplements. Problems of Productive Animal Biology, (4), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.25687/1996-6733.prodanimbiol.2018.3.65-74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YPHTLF
Xiaokang, L., Liang, Ch., Chuanshe, Zh., Yibing, G., Guijie, Zh., & Jinhe, K. (2022). Dietary tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil supplementation enhances the expressions of amino acid transporters in goat ileal mucosa and improves intestinal immunity. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(11), 3749–3758. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2972. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZUXLDZ
Korotkova, A. A., Gorlov, I. F., & Kononov, V. M. (2013). Assessment of the physiological response of lactating goat dams to the introduction of the feed additive “IODDAR Zn” and the drug DAFS 25 into their diet. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals, (8), 20–22. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RGPGEV
Khairullina, G. F., & Gainullina, M. K. (n.d.). Ginger seed feed additives in the diets of lactating goats. Scientific Notes of the Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N. E. Bauman, 234(2), 208–210.
Molyanova, G. V., Semkina, O. V., Statenko, B. I., & Vinokurova, A. P. (2023). Biochemical parameters of blood in Saanen goat kids when using a preparation based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Proceedings of the Samara State Agricultural Academy, (4), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.55170/19973225_2023_8_4_79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HZLFJN
Список литературы
Кравченко, А. П., & Владимиров, Н. И. (2021). Оценка роста молодняка коз молочного направления при введении в рацион пробиотика «Плантарум». Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета, (5), 79–83. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JEWALI
Luo, Y., Su, L., Su, R., Wang, B., Liu, Ch., & Wang, Zh. (2020). Effects of Astragalus membranaceus supplementation on oxidative stability of Cashmere goat. Food Science & Nutrition, 8(10), 5550–5556. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1786. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IFQGEC
Nazari, P., Farshad, A., Vaziry, A., & Rostamzadeh, J. (2020). Evaluation of pentoxifylline and Basal Medium Eagle supplemented to dilute on cryopreserved goat spermatozoa. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(10), 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13774. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UBAHYU
Yadav, D., Singh, A. K., Kumar, B., Mahla, A. S., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Effect of n 3 PUFA rich fish oil supplementation during late gestation on kidding, uterine involvement and resumption of follicular activity in goat. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 54(12), 1651–1659.
Красовская, Т. Л., & Новопашина, С. И. (2022). Влияние гумивала на неспецифическую резистентность и сохранность козлят и ягнят. Сборник научных трудов Ставропольского научно исследовательского института животноводства и кормопроизводства, 2(1), 62–65.
Зубайру, А. Х., Малахова, Л. С., & Грига, О. Э. (2022). Влияние кормовых добавок «ЛактоМин» и «ЛактуВет» на молочную продуктивность коз. Сельскохозяйственный журнал, (1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.25930/2687-1254/010.1.15.2022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BYKHIA
Функ, И. А., & Владимиров, Н. И. (2022). Влияние пробиотического препарата «Плантарум» на молочную продуктивность и качество молока коз. Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета, (5), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.53083/1996-4277-2022-211-5-56-61. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GPAZTL
Горлов, И. Ф., Короткова, А. А., & Мосолова, Н. И. (2013). Эффективность применения кормовой добавки «ЙОДДАР Zn» и препарата ДАФС 25 в молочном козоводстве. Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета, (3), 78–82. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWPWTL
Смоленцев, С. Ю. (2023). Санитарная оценка и технологические показатели молока коз при использовании в рационе кормовой добавки «АльгаВет». Ветеринарный врач, (5), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.33632/1998-698X_2023_5_10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YGSOEF
Горлов, И. Ф., & Николаева, Д. В. (2022). Влияние лактулозосодержащих кормовых добавок на продуктивность, качественные показатели молока и иммунный статус коз. Животноводство и кормопроизводство, 105(4), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-89. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HSYJJE
Скворцова, Е. Г., & Филинская, О. Г. (2020). Рост и развитие ягнят и козлят при использовании микробиологического препарата «Эм Курунга». Известия Оренбургского государственного аграрного университета, (3), 325–328. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MRBAHN
Altukhova, O. B., & Semenov, S. N. (2013). Veterinary and sanitary assessment and technological indicators of goat milk against the background of the use of stevia pulp. Veterinary Pathology, (4), 78–82.
Яшкин, А. И., & Владимиров, Н. И. (2022). Молочная продуктивность лактирующих коз сааненской породы при использовании пробиотических препаратов. Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета, (4), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.53083/1996-4277-2022-210-4-67-72. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PGZLNM
Макар, З. Н., & Черепанов, Г. Г. (2018). Формирование субстратного баланса в молочной железе и выработка белка у коз при скармливании высокобелкового рациона с добавками ацетата или пропионата натрия. Проблемы биологии продуктивных животных, (4), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.25687/1996-6733.prodanimbiol.2018.3.65-74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YPHTLF
Xiaokang, L., Liang, Ch., Chuanshe, Zh., Yibing, G., Guijie, Zh., & Jinhe, K. (2022). Dietary tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil supplementation enhances the expressions of amino acid transporters in goat ileal mucosa and improves intestinal immunity. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(11), 3749–3758. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2972. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZUXLDZ
Короткова, А. А., Горлов, И. Ф., & Кононов, В. М. (2013). Оценка физиологической реакции лактирующих козоматок на введение в их рацион кормовой добавки «ЙОДДАР Zn» и препарата ДАФС 25. Аграрный вестник Урала, (8), 20–22. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RGPGEV
Хайруллина, Г. Ф., & Гайнуллина, М. К. (20XX). Кормовые добавки из семян имбиря в рационах лактирующих коз. Учёные записки Казанской государственной академии ветеринарной медицины им. Н. Э. Баумана, 234(2), 208–210.
Молянова, Г. В., Семкина, О. В., Статенко, Б. И., & Винокурова, А. П. (2023). Биохимические параметры крови козлят зааненской породы при применении препарата на основе Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Известия Самарской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии, (4), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.55170/19973225_2023_8_4_79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HZLFJN
Copyright (c) 2025 Galina V. Molyanova, Matvey M. Orlov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.





















































