APPLICATION OF VEGETATION INDECES FOR DOGITAL SOIL MAPPING BASED ON SENTINEL-2 SPACE IMAGES

Keywords: digital soil mapping, geographic (geoinformation) information systems, space images, vegetation indices, agriculture

Abstract

At present, the works devoted to the creation of digital soil maps using geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) data are relevant. In the work the analysis of vegetation indices (VI) for soil mapping was carried out, the maps of vegetation indices were created:  Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Optimized Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (OSAVI), Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Tranformed Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index2 (EVI2) for the territory of ZAO Mirny farm of Kochenevsky District using Sentinel-2 A satellite image (May 10, 2021). ). As a result it was revealed that the vegetation indices OSAVI and EVI2 allow to establish spatial boundaries between the main types of soils of automorphic, half-hydromorphic and hydromorphic moisture regimes.

Background. Multispectral space and aerial photos for thematic mapping of soil resources are of greater practical application. Sentinel-2 A space image with good spatial and spectrozonal resolution (10 m, 20 m and 60 m) and territorial coverage (290 km) was used in this article. This made it possible to calculate and analyze various vegetation indices for the purposes of digital soil mapping.

Purpose. аnalysis of vegetation indices for digital soil mapping based on Sentinel-2 A images.

Materials and research methods.  The research was carried out on the territory of CJSC Mirniy, Kochenevsky District, Novosibirsk Region. The methods of digital processing of space images, mapping and geoinformation analysis with the use of Sentinel-2 A satellite image (May 10, 2021) were used. The method of equal intervals was used for comparative analysis of images. This allowed using GIS ArcGIS to make thematic maps of images with the allocation of gradations: very low, low, average, above average, high value.

Results. Field soil surveys were carried out on the territory of CJSC Mirny farm in Kochenevsky district of Novosibirsk Region. Using SAGA geoinformation system the space image was atmospherically corrected and spatially referenced, NDVI, OSAVI, TSAVI, EVI2 raster maps were compiled. Geoinformation analysis of the large-scale 1:1000 soil map and raster EVI maps revealed that OSAVI allows to establish spatial boundaries between the main types of soils of automorphic, half-hydromorphic and hydromorphic moisture regimes. Very low values of VI are typical for the soils of hydromorphic humidification regime, formed near small lakes, along the banks of the Sharikh river.

Very low values of UI have objects of hydrography, marsh peaty, meadow-marsh humus soils, marshy and peated marshes, marsh solonchaks, marsh solonchaks, formed in lowered areas of relief with depth of groundwater occurrence less than 0.5 m.

Ploughed ordinary chernozems, deposited in the upper and middle part of the gentle slope, have low values of WP. These are soils of automorphous moisture regime with depth of groundwater occurrence more than 6 m.

Average and above average values are characteristic of gray forest saltwort soils under woody vegetation, as well as meadow-chernozem soils under meadow vegetation in the lower part of the gentle slope with groundwater occurrence depth from 3 to 4 m. High WI values were obtained for meadow soils with dense grass cover.  Wetting conditions of soils, location in the relief, and vegetation type significantly influence VI values. The obtained VV values can be used at the stage of training data preparation in the form of reference classes for basic soil types required for automatic image recognition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anna I. Pavlova, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management

PhD (technical sciences), Associate Professor

References

Kalichkin V.K., Pavlova A.I., Shoba V.N., Kalichkin A.V. Integration of agroecological and technological properties of land. Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agroindustrial Complex, 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 11-14. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2019-10302

Savin I.Y., Vernyuk Y.I., Faraslis I. Possibilities of using drones for operational monitoring of soil productivity. Bulletin of Soil Institute named after V.V. Dokuchaev. 2015, no. 80, pp.95 - 105

Cherepanov, A.S. Spectral properties of vegetation and vegetation indices / A.S. Cherepanov, E.G. Druzhinina. Geomatics, 2009, no. 3, pp.28-32.

Baret F., Guyot G. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991, vol. 35, pp. 161-173.

Clevers J. G. P. W., Gitelson A. A. Remote estimation of crop and grass chlorophyll and nitrogen content using red-edge bands on Sentinel-2 and-3. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, no. 23, pp. 344–351.

Gao B.-C. NDWI – A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, vol. 58, pp. 257-266.

Gitelson A. A., Kaufman,Y. J., Merzlyak M. N. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, vol. 58, pp. 289-298.

Giteson A. A., Kaufman Y. J. MODIS NDVI optimization to fit the AVHRR data series-spectral considerations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, vol. 66, pp. 343-350.

Gitelson A. A. Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, no. 161, pp. 165–173.

Haboudane D., Miller J. R., Tremblay N., Zarco-Tejada P. J., Dextraze L. Integrated narrowband vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, vol. 81, pp. 416-426.

Hardisky M. A., Klemas V., Smart R. M. The influences of soil salinity, growth form, and leaf moisture on the spectral reflectance of Spartina alterniflora canopies. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1983, no. 49, pp. 77–83.

Hill M. J. Vegetation index suites as indicators of vegetation state in grassland and savanna: An analysis with simulated SENTINEL 2 data for a North American transect. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, no. 137, pp. 94–111.

Houborg R., Fisher J.B., Skidmore A.K. Advances in remote sensing of vegetation function and traits. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2015, vol. 43, pp. 1-6.

Huan Jing-feng, Tang Yan-Lin New vegetation index and its application in estimation leaf area index of rice. Rice Ecience, 2007, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(07)60027-4

Huete A R. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988, no. 5, pp. 295-309.

Jiang Z. Y., Huete A. R., Didan K., Miura T. Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, vol. 112, pp. 3833-3845.

Lee W.S., Alchanatis V., Yang C., Hirafuji M.; Moshou D., Li, C. Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, vol. 74, pp. 2-33.

Li L., Zhu D., Yao S. at al. Design and implementation of geographic information systems, remote sensing, and global positioning system –based information platform for locust control // Journal Appled Remote Sensing. 2014, vol. 8 (1), 084899 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.8.084899

Lv T. T., Liu C. Study on extraction of crop information using time-series MODIS data in the Chao Phraya Basin of Thailand. Advances in Space Research, 2010, no. 45, pp. 775–784.

Miura T., Yoshioka, H., Fujiwara K., Yamamoto H. Inter-comparison of ASTER and MODIS surface reflectance and vegetation index products for synergistic applications to natural resource monitoring. Sensors, 2008, no. 8, pp. 2480-2499.

Rondeaux G., Steven M., Baret F. Optimisation of soil adjusted vegetation indices. Remote sensing of Envinronment, 1996, vol. 55, iss. 2, pp. 95 -107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7

Tucker C. J. Monitoring corn and soybean crop development with hand-held radiometer spectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, vol. 8, pp. 237-248.

Vaudour E., Gomez C., Fouad Y., Lagacherie. Sentinel-2 image capacities to predict common topsoil properties of temperature and Mediterrian agroecosystem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, vol. 223, pp. 21-23.

Vermeulen D., Niekerk A. Evaluation of a WorldView-2 image for soil salinity monitoring in a moderately affected irrigated area. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2016, vol. 10(2), 026025 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.026025

Wang K., Yanbing Q., Guo W., Zhang J., Chang Q. Retrieval and mapping of soil organic carbon using Sentinel-2A spectral images from bare cropland in Autumn. Remote Sensing, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061072

Yoder B. J., Waring R. H. The normalized vegetation index of small douglas-fir canopies with varying chlorophyll concentration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, vol. 49, pp. 81-91.

Abstract views: 735

Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Pavlova, A. (2021). APPLICATION OF VEGETATION INDECES FOR DOGITAL SOIL MAPPING BASED ON SENTINEL-2 SPACE IMAGES. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 13(6), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2021-13-6-119-131
Section
Agricultural Sciences