DIGESTIBILITY AND ABSORPTION OF NUTRIENTS BY YOUNG CATTLE AT INCLUSION OF COMPLEX FEED ADDITIVES INTO THE DIETS IN THE CONDITIONS OF YAKUTIA
Abstract
It is known that cattle with a high genetic potential of productivity cannot fully realize it in the conditions of Yakutia. This is facilitated by many factors, especially it is necessary to highlight the basic feeds, which are poorly provided with nutrients and minerals. Therefore, the development of technologies and methods to increase productivity of cattle through inclusion of complex feed additives from natural resources in their diets is of scientific and practical importance for the conditions of risky agriculture. In this regard, the goal was to study effect of complex feed additives from local natural raw materials on the digestibility and metabolism of young cattle. The studies used methods generally accepted in zootechnical practice, setting up for the experiment was carried out according to the method (M.F. Tomme, 1969). Experiments were conducted on 3 groups of young cattle. Each group has 10 heads selected by the method of analogues. When analyzing the data on the digestibility and absorption of nutrients, it was found that the animals of the experimental groups digested nutrients better compared to the animals of the control group: dry matter by 1.44% and 0.1%, organic matter by 2.0% and 1.65%, crude protein by 1.68% and 1.16%, crude fat by 2.28% and 1.33%, crude fiber by 2.48% and 2.04%, and nitrogen-free extractives by 1.88% and 1.61%. At the same time, the animals of the experimental groups used nitrogen better compared to the control group by 2,28% and 1,05%. The study of the biochemical composition of animal blood showed that complex feed additives are harmless. Thus, the inclusion of complex feed additives in the diets of young cattle can improve the indicators of digestibility and the degree of use of nutrients in the conditions of Yakutia.
Downloads
References
References
Bacakova L., Vandrovcova M., Kopova I., Jirka I. Applications of zeolites in biotechnology and medicine – a review. Biomaterials science, 2018, vol. 6(5), pp. 974-989. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00028J
Basha H. A., Goma A. A., Taha A. E., Abou Elkhair R. Effect of different forms of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) on productive performance and behavioral patterns of broiler chickens. International Journal of Agriculture Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016, vol. 4(4), pp. 1-11.
Chernogradskaya N. M., Grigorev M. F., Grigoreva A. I., Tatarinova Z. G. Digestibility and Metabolism of Young Cattle in Yakutia after Inclusion of Non-Conventional Feed Additives in their Diet. Proceedings of IV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern S&T Equipments and Problems in Agriculture”. 2020. Kemerovo (Russia), pp. 64-73. https://doi.org/10.32743/kuz.mepa.2020.64-73
Chugunov A. V. Simmentalizirovannyy skot Yakutii [Simmentalized cattle of Yakutia]. Yakutsk: Book. publishing house, 1981, 140 p.
Deen A. U., Tyagi N., Yadav R. D., Kumar S., Tyagi A. K., Singh S. K. Feeding balanced ration can improve the productivity and economics of milk production in dairy cattle: a comprehensive field study. Tropical animal health and production, 2019, vol. 51(4), pp. 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1747-8
Erdenechimeg A., Otgonjargal A., Togtokhbayar N. Effects of concentrated feed enriched with zeolite and glycerin on productivity of beef cattle. Mongolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, vol. 24(02), pp. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5564/mjas.v24.i02.1110
Federalʹnaya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki po RS(YA) [Federal State Statistics Service of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)]. URL: https://sakha.gks.ru
Khachlouf K., Hamed H., Gdoura R., Gargouri A. Effects of Zeolite supplementation on dairy cow production and ruminal parameters – a review. Annals of animal science, 2018, vol. 18(4), pp. 857-877. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0025
Mishra M., Jain S. K. Properties and applications of zeolites: a review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B-Biological Sciences, 2011, vol. 81, pp. 250-259.
Popova A. V. Plemennoy skot Yakutii [Pedigree cattle of Yakutia]. Complex issues of agricultural science for the agro-industrial complex of the Republic, 2019, pp. 166-169.
Prasai T. P., Walsh K. B., Midmore D. J., Bhattarai S. P. Effect of biochar, zeolite and bentonite feed supplements on egg yield and excreta attributes. Animal Production Science, 2018, vol. 58(9), pp. 1632-1641. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16290
Romanov P.A. Sovershenstvovaniye krupnogo rogatogo skota v Yakutii [Improving the breeding qualities of cattle in Yakutia]. Yakutsk: Book publishing house, 1978, 152 p.
Sysolyatina V. V., Tikhonov I. V. Analiz produktivnosti korov v plemennykh khozyaystvakh Respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya) [Analysis of cow productivity in breeding farms of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)]. Scientific support for the sustainable functioning and development of the agro-industrial complex of Yakutia, 2019, pp. 170-173.
Sysolyatina V. V., Tikhonov I. V. Analiz sostoyaniya plemennoy raboty v respublike po skotovodstvu [Analysis of the state of livestock breeding in the republic]. Scientific support for the sustainable functioning and development of the agro-industrial complex of Yakutia, 2019, pp. 127-129.
Taov I. K., Kagermazov T. B., Khuranov A. M. Ecological Aspects of microelements’ and Vitamins’ Salts Impact on Dairy Cows’ Productivity and Reproductive Function in Mountain Territories of KBR. KnE Life Sciences, 2019, pp. 362-368. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i14.5622
Tozer P. R., Stokes J. R. A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management. Agricultural systems, 2001, vol. 67(3), pp. 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00056-1
Tuzov I. N., Ryadchikov V. G., Ratoshniy A. N., Kulikova N. I., Koshchaev A. G. Using Holstein Cattle in Conditions of the Krasnodar Territory. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2018, vol. 10(12), p. 3160.
Ulitko V. E. The use of metabolizable energy and cow productivity depending on the level of dairy feeds fed during their raising period. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2018, vol. 9(4). pp. 76-80.
Ulitko V. E., Pykhtina L. A., Erisanova O. E., Gulyaeva L. Yu. Influence of sorbent additives on quality indicators of meat as raw materials for food production in broiler diet. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2017, vol. 8(2), pp. 2155-2160.
Vila-Donat P., Marín S., Sanchis V., Ramos A. J. A review of the mycotoxin adsorbing agents, with an emphasis on their multi-binding capacity, for animal feed decontamination. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2018, vol. 114, pp. 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.044
Список литературы
Bacakova L., Vandrovcova M., Kopova I., Jirka I. Applications of zeolites in biotechnology and medicine – a review // Biomaterials science. 2018. Vol. 6(5). P. 974-989. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00028J
Basha H.A., Goma A.A., Taha A.E., Abou Elkhair R. Effect of different forms of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) on productive performance and behavioral patterns of broiler chickens // International Journal of Agriculture Science and Veterinary Medicine. 2016. Vol. 4(4). P. 1-11.
Chernogradskaya N.M., Grigorev M.F., Grigoreva A.I., Tatarinova Z.G. Digestibility and Metabolism of Young Cattle in Yakutia after Inclusion of Non-Conventional Feed Additives in their Diet // Proceedings of IV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern S&T Equipments and Problems in Agriculture”. Kemerovo (Russia), 2020. P. 64-73. https://doi.org/10.32743/kuz.mepa.2020.64-73
Чугунов А.В. Симментализированный скот Якутии. Якутск: Кн. Изд-во. 1981. 140 с.
Deen A.U., Tyagi N., Yadav R.D., Kumar S., Tyagi A.K., Singh S.K. Feeding balanced ration can improve the productivity and economics of milk production in dairy cattle: a comprehensive field study // Tropical animal health and production. 2019. Vol. 51(4), P. 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1747-8
Erdenechimeg A., Otgonjargal A., Togtokhbayar N. Effects of concentrated feed enriched with zeolite and glycerin on productivity of beef cattle // Mongolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018. Vol. 24 (02). P. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5564/mjas.v24.i02.1110
Федеральная служба государственной статистики по РС(Я). Электронный ресурс. URL: https://sakha.gks.ru/
Khachlouf K., Hamed H., Gdoura R., Gargouri A. Effects of Zeolite supplementation on dairy cow production and ruminal parameters – a review // Annals of animal science. 2018. Vol. 18(4). P. 857-877. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0025
Mishra M., Jain S.K. Properties and applications of zeolites: a review // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B-Biological Sciences. 2011. Vol. 81. P. 250-259.
Попова А.В. Племенной скот Якутии // Комплексные вопросы аграрной науки для АПК Республики: сборник материалов внутривузовской научно-практической конференции. 2019. С. 166-169.
Prasai T.P., Walsh K.B., Midmore D.J., Bhattarai S.P. Effect of biochar, zeolite and bentonite feed supplements on egg yield and excreta attributes // Animal Production Science. 2018. Vol 58(9), P. 1632-1641. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16290
Романов П.А. Совершенствование крупного рогатого скота в Якутии. Якутск: Кн. изд-во, 1978. 152 с.
Сысолятина В.В., Тихонов И.В. Анализ продуктивности коров в племенных хозяйствах Республики Саха (Якутия) // Научное обеспечение устойчивого функционирования и развития АПК Якутии: сборник научных трудов. 2019. С. 170-173.
Сысолятина В.В., Тихонов И.В. Анализ состояния племенной работы в республике по скотоводству // Научное обеспечение устойчивого функционирования и развития АПК Якутии: сборник научных трудов. 2019.С. 127-129.
Taov I.K., Kagermazov T.B., Khuranov A.M. Ecological Aspects of microelements’ and Vitamins’ Salts Impact on Dairy Cows’ Productivity and Reproductive Function in Mountain Territories of KBR // KnE Life Sciences, 2019.P. 362-368. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i14.5622
Tozer P.R., Stokes J.R. A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management // Agricultural systems. 2001. Vol. 67(3). P. 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00056-1
Tuzov I.N., Ryadchikov V.G., Ratoshniy A.N., Kulikova N.I., Koshchaev A.G. Using Holstein Cattle in Conditions of the Krasnodar Territory // Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2018. Vol. 10(12). P. 3160.
Ulitko V.E. The use of metabolizable energy and cow productivity depending on the level of dairy feeds fed during their raising period // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2018. Vol. 9(4). P. 76-80.
Ulitko V.E., Pykhtina L.A., Erisanova O.E., Gulyaeva L.Yu. Influence of sorbent additives on quality indicators of meat as raw materials for food production in broiler diet // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2017. Vol. 8(2). P. 2155-2160.
Vila-Donat P., Marín S., Sanchis V., Ramos A.J. A review of the mycotoxin adsorbing agents, with an emphasis on their multi-binding capacity, for animal feed decontamination // Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2018. Vol. 114, P. 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.044
Copyright (c) 2023 Mikhail F. Grigorev, Vladimir A. Soloshenko, Alexandra I. Grigoreva, Natalia M. Chernogradskaya, Daria I. Stepanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
