SUBJECTIVE AGE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH OF WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER

Elena A. Sergienko; Diana А. Tsiring; Yana N. Pakhomova; Irina V. Ponomareva

doi:10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-239-253

Elena A. Sergienko Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4068-9116
Diana А. Tsiring National Research Tomsk State University; Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-0234
Yana N. Pakhomova National Research Tomsk State University; Chelyabinsk State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-7238
Irina V. Ponomareva National Research Tomsk State University; Chelyabinsk State University; Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8600-3533

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-239-253

Keywords: subjective evaluation of the health, quality of life, subjective age, breast cancer, oncopsychology

Abstract

This article is devoted to the results of the study of the relationship between subjective age and subjective assessment of health among women with breast cancer. The analysis of the literature showed that subjective age is a predictor of death, mental wellness, assessment of life prospects (approach of death), possibility of coping with a bad trauma (e.g. oncological disease). The research included 170 women in the age of 31 to 85 (the average age is 56,5) diagnosed with breast cancer on different stages. Summarising received data, it should be noted that the women who feel rather danger than their chronological age address to own resources and, in general their subjective health assessment is connected with role functioning based on the emotional condition and general mental health. The women with adequate perception of their age have issues with role functioning connected with physical condition as well as the women who feel older than they actually are do. The results of this research expand a notion about potential predictors for breast cancer course, besides the results can be used for building the forecast of the disease course and its outcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elena A. Sergienko, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Chief Researcher, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor

Diana А. Tsiring, National Research Tomsk State University; Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Chief Researcher, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor; Director

Yana N. Pakhomova, National Research Tomsk State University; Chelyabinsk State University

PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher; Associate Professor

Irina V. Ponomareva, National Research Tomsk State University; Chelyabinsk State University; Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher; Head of Department; Deputy Director

References

Barak B. Age identity: A cross-cultural global approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2009, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408099485

Duggan C., Dvaladze A., Rositch A. F., Ginsburg O., Yip C. H., Horton S., Camacho Rodriguez R., Eniu A., Mutebi M., Bourque J. M., Masood S., Unger-Saldaña K., Cabanes A., Carlson R. W., Gralow J. R., Anderson B. O. The Breast Health Global Initiative 2018 Global Summit on Improving Breast Healthcare Through Resource-Stratified Phased Implementation: Methods and overview. Cancer, 2020, 126 Suppl 10(Suppl 10), pp. 2339–2352. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32891

Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Soerjomataram I., Bray F. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today

Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, et al. Global, regional, and National cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and Disability-Adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol, 2019, vol. 5(12), pp. 1749–1768. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996

Gurevich K.G. Fabrikant E.G. Methodological recommendations for the organization of programs for the prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases. Moscow State Medical and Dental University, 2008. URL: http://bono-esse.ru/blizzard/RPP/M/ORGZDRAV/Orgproga/org_proga.html

Hoffman Y.S., Shrira A., Cohen-Fridel S. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms as a function of the interactive effect of subjective age and subjective nearness to death. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, vol. 102, pp. 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2016.07.017

Klimova M.O., Tsiring D.A. Personal helplessness as a factor of the course of the disease in oncological diseases (theoretical analysis). Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 362–366. https://doi.org/10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0088

Lillberg K., Verkasalo P.K., Kaprio J. et al. Stress of daily activities and risk of breast cancer: prospective cohort study in Finland. International Journal of Cancer, 2001, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 888–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::aid-ijc1138>3.0.co;2-d

Sergienko E.A. Subjective age as a predictor of the course of a serious illness. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. The series "Psychology. Pedagogy. Education", 2020, vol. 1, pp. 25–39. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2020-1-25-39

Sergienko E.A. The role of subjective age in the regulation of vital activity. In A.L. Zhuravlev, N.V. Tarabrina, E.A. Sergienko, N.E. Harlamenkova (eds.) Psychology of Everyday and Traumatic Stress: Threats, Consequences and Coping. Moscow: Publ. of Institute of Psychology, 2016, pp. 50–84.

Sergienko E.A., Tsiring D.A., Pakhomova Y.N., Ponomareva I.V. Subjective Age of Women with Breast Cancer in the System of Psychological Factors. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 2022, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–89. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110104

Shrira A., Hoffman Y., Bodner E. et al. COVID-19-related loneliness and psychiatric symptoms among older adults: the buffering role of subjective age. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2020, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.018

Statistics of breast cancer in the world and Russia. URL: https://www.oncoforum.ru/o-rake/statistika-raka/statistika-raka-molochnykh-zhelez-v-mire-i-rossii.html

Stephan Y., Sutin A.R., Terracciano A. Subjective Age and Mortality in Three Longitudinal Samples. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2018, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000613

Stephan Y., Sutin A.R., Terracciano A. Younger subjective age is associated with lower C-reactive protein among older adult. Drain, Behavior and Immunity, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2014.07.019

Tarabrina N.V., Vorona O.A., Kurchakova M.S., Padun M.A., Shatalova N.E. Oncopsychology. Post-traumatic stress in breast cancer patients. Moscow: Publ. of Institute of Psychology, 2010, 175 p.

Ware J.E.J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scale: a user’s manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1994, 316 p.

Список литературы

Barak B. Age identity: A cross-cultural global approach // International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2009, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408099485

Duggan C., Dvaladze A., Rositch A. F., Ginsburg O., Yip C. H., Horton S., Camacho Rodriguez R., Eniu A., Mutebi M., Bourque J. M., Masood S., Unger-Saldaña K., Cabanes A., Carlson R. W., Gralow J. R., Anderson B. O. The Breast Health Global Initiative 2018 Global Summit on Improving Breast Healthcare Through Resource-Stratified Phased Implementation: Methods and overview // Cancer, 2020, 126 Suppl 10(Suppl 10), pp. 2339–2352. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32891

Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Soerjomataram I., Bray F. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today

Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, et al. Global, regional, and National cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and Disability-Adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study // JAMA Oncol., 2019, vol. 5(12), pp. 1749–1768. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996

Гуревич К.Г., Фабрикант Е.Г. Методические рекомендации по организации программ профилактики хронических неинфекционных заболеваний. ГОУ ВПО Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет. 2008. URL: http://bono-esse.ru/blizzard/RPP/M/ORGZDRAV/Orgproga/org_proga.html

Hoffman Y.S., Shrira A., Cohen-Fridel S. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms as a function of the interactive effect of subjective age and subjective nearness to death // Personality and Individual Differences. 2016, vol. 102, pp. 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2016.07.017

Климова М.О., Циринг Д.А. Личностная беспомощность как фактор течения болезни при онкозаболеваниях (теоретический анализ) // Азимут научных исследований: педагогика и психология. 2020. Т. 9. № 1 (30). C. 362–366. https://doi.org/10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0088

Lillberg K., Verkasalo P.K., Kaprio J. et al. Stress of daily activities and risk of breast cancer: prospective cohort study in Finland // International Journal of Cancer, 2001, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 888–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::aid-ijc1138>3.0.co;2-d

Сергиенко Е.А. Субъективный возраст как предиктор течения тяжелой болезни // Вестник РГГУ. Серия «Психология. Педагогика. Образование». 2020. № 1. С. 25–39. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2020-1-25-39

Сергиенко Е.А. Роль субъективного возраста в регуляции жизнедеятельности // Психология повседневного и травматического стресса: угрозы, последствия и совладание / Под ред. А.Л. Журавлева, Н.В. Тарабриной, Е.А. Сергиенко, Н.Е. Харламенковой. М.: изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2016. С. 50–84.

Сергиенко Е.А., Циринг Д.А., Пахомова Я.Н., Пономарева И.В. Субъективный возраст женщин с раком молочной железы в системе психологических факторов // Клиническая и специальная психология. 2022. Т. 11. № 1. С. 67–89. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110104

Shrira A., Hoffman Y., Bodner E. et al. COVID-19-related loneliness and psychiatric symptoms among older adults: the buffering role of subjective age // The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2020, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.018

Statistics of breast cancer in the world and Russia. URL: https://www.oncoforum.ru/o-rake/statistika-raka/statistika-raka-molochnykh-zhelez-v-mire-i-rossii.html

Stephan Y., Sutin A.R., Terracciano A. Subjective Age and Mortality in Three Longitudinal Samples // Psychosomatic Medicine, 2018, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000613

Stephan Y., Sutin A.R., Terracciano A. Younger subjective age is associated with lower C-reactive protein among older adult // Drain, Behavior and Immunity, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2014.07.019

Тарабрина Н.В., Ворона О.А., Курчакова М.С. и др. Онкопсихология. Посттравматический стресс у больных раком молочной железы. М.: изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2010. 175 с.

Ware J.E.J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scale: a user’s manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1994. 316 p.

FOR AUTHORS

EDITORIAL POLICIES