THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL AND CLIMATIC FEATURES OF THE DRY-STEPPE ZONE OF CHESTNUT SOILS OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF NEW VARIETIES OF WINTER WHEAT
Abstract
Background. In the conditions of the dry steppe zone of the Lower Volga region, winter soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is considered the main food crop. It occupies about 2.0 million hectares of acreage in the Volgograd region. Basically, all farmers in our region sow time-tested varieties and do not pay attention to new varieties that are currently being bred by breeders.
The article presents the results of tests of new varieties of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), conducted in the dry-steppe zone of chestnut soils of the Volgograd region, in the fields of the farm "Kirsanov S.M." H. Zhutovo 1. The list of tested varieties was formed based on the high interest of farmers of the Volgograd region to the varieties of ANC "Donskoy" Zernograd.
During the tests conducted from 2018 to 2021, we selected the varieties most suitable for our conditions. Farmers are very interested in them as they have replaced old wheat varieties with new ones. The Ermak variety was taken over.
Methods. The technology of cultivating winter wheat varieties in field experiments was according to B. A. Dospekhov and the methodology of the state variety testing of agricultural crops.
Results. The density of the productive stem had the greatest impact on the yield of the tested varieties. The leaders in this indicator were the varieties Don Steppe and Lydia – 358 pcs./m2. On average, the number of productive stems was in the range 312-358 pcs./m2. At the same time, the weight of 1000 seeds did not change significantly, from 34.6 to 36.0 g, on average, during the test period.
The best yields were shown by the varieties of winter wheat Don Steppe 3.31 t/ha and Lydia 3.38 t/ha.
Despite the lack of fertilizers and top dressing, the Etude and Don Steppe varieties were able to demonstrate a fairly high level of protein accumulation in grain at the level of 11.9 and 12.0%, respectively.
Conclusion. As noted above, the conditions of the experiment did not allow winter wheat varieties to show high results in the accumulation of protein in the grain. However, the harsh background of the tests made it possible to objectively assess the potential of the varieties, their ability to show good results outside of stimulating fertilizing. Such varieties as Don Steppe and Etude were the undisputed leaders here. On average, over three years, they showed a result of 12.0 and 11.9%, respectively. Thus, according to the totality of indicators, such varieties of winter wheat as the Don Steppe, Lydia, the Beauty of the Don, Etude can be distinguished.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Гузенко А.В. Влияние макро- и микроудобрений на урожайность и качество сортов озимой пшеницы // Агрохимический вестник. 2021. № 3. С. 78-84. https://doi.org/10.24412/1029-2551-2021-3-016
Гузенко А.Ю., Солонкин А.В., Беляев А.И., Семинченко Е.В. Зависимость урожайности озимой пшеницы (Triticum aestivum L.) от почвенно-климатических условий и различных обработок почвы в зоне светло-каштановых почв Волго-Донского междуречья Южного федерального округа Российской Федерации // Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2023. Т. 15, № 2. С. 92-124. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-2-92-124
Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований): учеб. для выс. с.-х. уч. заведений. М.: Альянс, 2014. 351 с.
Долгополова Н. В. Влияние стимуляторов роста на развитие и продуктивность озимой пшеницы / Н. В. Долгополова, А. А. Бабаскина // Вестник Курской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2022. № 1. С. 34-41.
Иванов В.М. Производство продукции растениеводства: курс лекций / В.М. Иванов, Н.И. Тихонов. Волгоград: Волгоградский ГАУ, 2017. 277 с.
Камбулов С.И., Ксенз А.Я., Колесник В.В., Дёмина Е.Б. Показатели эффективности микроудобрений при использовании усовершенствованной технологии листовой подкормки // Инновации в сельском хозяйстве. 2015. № 2 (12). С. 117–121.
Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур. Выпуск второй: зерновые, крупяные, зернобобовые, кукуруза и кормовые культуры. М.: из-во Калининская областная типография управления издательств, полиграфии и книжной торговли Калининского облисполкома, 1989. 194 с.
Матюшенко Л.В., Калюшина З.М., Лихачев Б.С. Методика определения силы роста семян. М.: МСХ СССР, Государственная семенная инспекция, 1983.
Набойченко К.В., Молчанов В.Н., Малахова А.А. Сорта озимой пшеницы Волгоградской селекции в засушливых условиях Нижнего Поволжья // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2013. № 3(31). С. 95-98.
Сапунков В.Л. Экологическое испытание сортов озимой пшеницы "АНЦ "Донской" в зоне тёмно-каштановых почв Волгоградской области / В. Л. Сапунков, А. В. Солонкин, А. В. Гузенко // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2021. № 6(78). С. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-88-94
Семинченко Е.В. Влияние способ обработки почвы на ее водно-физические свойства в условиях сухостепной зоны Нижнего Поволжья // Агрохимия. 2021. No12. С. 75-81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188121120139
Ступин А.С. Основы семеноведения. СПб.: Лань, 2014. 384 с.
Филин В.И. Озимая пшеница в Нижнем Поволжье: монография / В.И. Филин, А.М. Беляков; ВИПККА. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2006. 258 с.
Ямщиков М.А., Пакуль В.Н. Влияние системы обработки на содержание продуктивной влаги в почве в Северной лесостепи Кузнецкой котловины // МНИЖ. 2022. № 3 (117). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.117.3.048
Araki H., Hossain Md. A., Takahashi T. Waterlogging and hypoxia have permanent effects on wheat root growth and respiration // Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2012. Vol. 198 (4). Р. 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00510.x
Asseng S., Martre P., Maiorano A., Rötter R.P., O'Leary G.J., Fitzgerald G.J., Girousse C., Motzo R., Giunta F.B., Babar M.A. et al. Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein // Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019. Vol. 25(1). Р. 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14481
Brock C., Oberholzer H.-R., Franko U. Soil organic matter balance as a practical tool for environmental impact assessment and management support in arable farming // Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2017. Vol. 68 (6). Р. 951-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12495
Byamukama E., Ali S., Kleinjan J. et al. Winter wheat grain yield response to fungicide application is influenced by cultivar and rainfall // Plant Pathol. J. 2019. Vol. 35(1). Р. 63-70. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2018.0056
Dybzinski R., Fargione JE, Zak DR, Fornara D, Tilman D. Soil fertility increases with plant species diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment // Oecologia. 2008. Vol. 158(1). Р. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1123-x
Gaweda D., Haliniarz М. Grain Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat Depending on Previous Crop and Tillage System // Agriculture. 2021. Vol. 11(2). Р. 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020133
Hannusch H.J., Rogers W.E., Lodge A.G., Starns H.D., Tolleson D.R. Semi-arid savanna herbaceous production and diversity responses to interactive effects of drought, nitrogen deposition, and fire // Journal of Vegetation Science. 2020. Vol. 31(2). Р. 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12848
References
Guzenko A.V. Influence of macro- and microfertilizers on yield and quality of winter wheat varieties. Agrochemical Bulletin, 2021, no. 3, pp. 78-84. https://doi.org/10.24412/1029-2551-2021-3-016
Guzenko A.Yu., Solonkin A.V., Belyaev A.I., Seminchenko E.V. Dependence of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield on soil-climatic conditions and different soil treatments in the zone of light-chestnut soils of the Volga-Don interfluve of the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 2023, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 92-124. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-2-92-124
Dospekhov B.A. Methodology of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results): textbook for higher agricultural schools. Moscow: Alliance, 2014, 351 p.
Dolgopolova N. V. Effect of growth stimulants on the development and productivity of winter wheat / N. V. Dolgopolova, A. A. Babaskina. Bulletin of Kursk State Agricultural Academy, 2022, no. 1, pp. 34-41.
Ivanov V.M. Production of crop production: a course of lectures / V.M. Ivanov, N.I. Tikhonov. Volgograd: Volgograd GAU, 2017, 277 p.
Kambulov S.I., Ksenz A.Y., Kolesnik V.V., Demina E.B. Indicators of microfertilizer efficiency when using the improved technology of leaf fertilization. Innovations in Agriculture, 2015, no. 2 (12), pp. 117-121.
Methods of state variety testing of agricultural crops. Issue two: cereals, cereals, legumes, corn and forage crops. M., 1989, 194 p.
Matyushenko L.V., Kalyushina Z.M., Likhachev B.S. Methods of determination of seed growth force. Moscow: Ministry of Agriculture of the USSR, State Seed Inspection, 1983.
Naboychenko K.V., Molchanov V.N., Malakhova A.A. Winter wheat varieties of Volgograd selection in arid conditions of the Lower Volga region. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie, 2013, no. 3(31), pp. 95-98.
Sapunkov V.L. Ecological testing of winter wheat varieties “ANC ‘Donskoy’ in the zone of dark chestnut soils of Volgograd region / V.L. Sapunkov, A.V. Solonkin, A.V. Guzenko. Grain Farming of Russia, 2021, no. 6(78), pp. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-78-6-88-94
Seminchenko E.V. Influence of soil tillage method on its water-physical properties in the conditions of the dry-steppe zone of the Lower Volga region. Agrochemistry, 2021, no. 12, pp. 75-81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188121120139
Stupin A.S. Fundamentals of seed science. SPb.: Lan, 2014, 384 p.
Filin V.I. Winter wheat in the Lower Volga region: monograph / V.I. Filin, A.M. Belyakov; VIPKKA. Volgograd: Izd-VolGU, 2006, 258 p.
Yamshchikov, M.A.; Pakul, V.N. Influence of tillage system on the productive moisture content in the soil in the Northern forest-steppe of the Kuznetsk Basin. MNIJ, 2022, no. 3 (117). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.117.3.048
Araki H., Hossain Md. A., Takahashi T. Waterlogging and hypoxia have permanent effects on wheat root growth and respiration. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2012, vol. 198 (4), pp. 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00510.x
Asseng S., Martre P., Maiorano A., Rötter R.P., O'Leary G.J., Fitzgerald G.J., Girousse C., Motzo R., Giunta F.B., Babar M.A. et al. Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Glob. Chang. Biol., 2019, vol. 25(1), pp. 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14481
Brock C., Oberholzer H.-R., Franko U. Soil organic matter balance as a practical tool for environmental impact assessment and management support in arable farming. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2017, vol. 68 (6), pp. 951-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12495
Byamukama E., Ali S., Kleinjan J. et al. Winter wheat grain yield response to fungicide application is influenced by cultivar and rainfall. Plant Pathol. J., 2019, vol. 35(1), pp. 63-70. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2018.0056
Dybzinski R., Fargione JE, Zak DR, Fornara D, Tilman D. Soil fertility increases with plant species diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Oecologia. 2008. Vol. 158(1). Р. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1123-x
Gaweda D., Haliniarz М. Grain Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat Depending on Previous Crop and Tillage System. Agriculture, 2021, vol. 11(2), pp. 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020133
Hannusch H.J., Rogers W.E., Lodge A.G., Starns H.D., Tolleson D.R. Semi-arid savanna herbaceous production and diversity responses to interactive effects of drought, nitrogen deposition, and fire. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2020, vol. 31(2), pp. 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12848
Copyright (c) 2024 Vitaly L. Sapunkov, Andrey V. Guzenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
