Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) plantations in forest conditions of the north-east of Moscow region

Keywords: lodgepole pine, plant introduction, forest plantations, growth and yield, Moscow region

Abstract

Background. Lodgepole pine is a fast-growing and hardy coniferous tree species native to western North America. To comprehensively assess its adaptability to the conditions of the coniferous-broadleaf forest zone, as well as to evaluate its growth rate, stability, resource potential, and ecological impact, a study covering a wide age range is required.

Purpose was to analyze the growth characteristics of lodgepole pine plantations under forest-growing conditions in the northeast of the Moscow region.

Materials and methods. The study area is located in the Ogudnevsky district of the Moscow Educational and Experimental Forestry. The trees were planted in the first half of 1991 using three-year-old seedlings. In the first half of 2025, a survey was conducted on a 0.2-hectare plot within the plantation.

Results. At a biological age of 37 years, lodgepole pine had an average height of 15.5 m and a timber stock of 95 m³/ha. In terms of growth rate, it was found to be slower than that of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Mortality in the plantation followed a bottom-up pattern, with the highest number of healthy and weakened trees concentrated in the intermediate diameter classes. The weighted average sanitary condition category of lodgepole pine classified it as severely weakened. Despite active fruiting, no natural regeneration of lodgepole pine was observed.

Conclusion. Based on these findings, lodgepole pine can be recommended for cultivation in forest plantations in the Moscow region for pulpwood production. However, to regulate species composition, improve sanitary conditions, and promote the growth of target tree species, timely silvicultural interventions are essential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr V. Lebedev, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Associate Professor at the Department of Land Organization and Forestry, Doctor of Agriculture Science, Associate Professor

Renat S. Khamitov, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Professor at the Department of Land Organization and Forestry, Doctor of Agriculture Science, Associate Professor

Svetlana M. Khamitova, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Associate Professor at the Department of Landscape Architecture, Candidate of Agriculture Science, Associate Professor

References

Алексеев, В. М. (2009). Анализ перспективности различных хвойных видов интродуцентов в лесокультурном производстве. Известия Санкт Петербургской лесотехнической академии, 186, 24–30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LJNHJP

Алексеев, В. М., Жигунов, А. В., Бондаренко, А. С., & Бурцев, Д. С. (2014). Интродукция сосны скрученной в условиях Ленинградской области. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал, 3(339), 24–33. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEEOHR

Бабич, Н. А., & Андронова, М. М. (2014). Сосна скрученная — перспективный интродуцент для озеленения малых северных городов. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал, 6(342), 155–160. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TALVRV

Гутий, А. Л. (2016). Состояние и рост экспериментальных культур сосны скрученной в Республике Коми. Лесоведение, 4, 265–269. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WKDYUF

Демидова, Н. А., Дуркина, Т. М., & Гоголева, Л. Г. (2017). Семеношение сосны скрученной широкохвойной (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm. ex Wats) в Архангельской области. Лесохозяйственная информация, 2, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2017.2.07. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHVAPF

Демидова, Н. А., Дуркина, Т. М., Гоголева, Л. Г., Быков, Ю. С., & Парамонов, А. А. (2017). Рост сосны скрученной (Pinus contorta Loud. var. latifolia S. Wats.) в Сторожевском лесничестве Республики Коми. Лесохозяйственная информация, 1, 24–33. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YIFEUX

Денисова, Н. Б., Лебедев, А. В., Волков, С. Н., Белов, Д. А., & Козлов, К. А. (2025). Санитарное и лесопатологическое состояние сосны пицундской (Pinus brutia var. pityusa (Steven) Silba) в Джанхотском бору. Природообустройство, 2, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-2-137-144. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KAZZWU

Дроздов, И. И., & Дроздов, Ю. И. (2005). Культуры сосны скрученной в решении сырьевой проблемы балансовой древесины. Вестник Московского государственного университета леса — Лесной вестник, 5, 83–84. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JSHJTH

Дроздов, Ю. И. (2008). Сосна скрученная (Pinus contorta) на опытных объектах МГУЛ. Вестник Московского государственного университета леса — Лесной вестник, 1, 188–191. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ISCIRB

Корчагов, С. А., & Хамитов, Р. С. (2020). Опыт выращивания сосны скрученной (Pinus contorta) в Вологодской области. Лесной вестник. Forestry Bulletin, 24(3), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2020-3-60-65. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EWIVGT

Лебедев, А. В. (2023). Инвентаризация древесных насаждений урбанизированных территорий с использованием смартфона. Лесотехнический журнал, 3(51), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2023.3/5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HBYIOC

Мелехов, И. С. (1984). Интродукция хвойных в лесном хозяйстве. Лесоведение, 6, 72–78. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZYMGIZ

Пристова, Т. А., Федорков, А. Л., & Новаковский, А. Б. (2023). Надземная фитомасса древостоя в экспериментальных культурах сосны скрученной в Сыктывкарском лесничестве Республики Коми. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал, 6(396), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-6-31-43. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XWIDOD

Раевский, Б. В., & Мордась, А. А. (2000). Рост и продуктивность испытательных культур сосны скрученной в южной Карелии. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал, 5–6, 74–81. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJYEEP

Раевский, Б. В. (2010). Ход роста смешанных культур сосны скрученной и сосны обыкновенной в южной Карелии. Известия Коми научного центра УрО РАН, 1(1), 31–38. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NCOGFT

Федорков, А. Л., & Гутий, Л. Н. (2017). Состояние экспериментальных культур сосны скрученной в Республике Коми. Вестник института биологии Коми научного центра Уральского отделения РАН, 2(200), 25–31. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZTUTSD

Феклистов, П. А., & Бирюков, С. Ю. (2006). Сезонный рост сосны скрученной в северной подзоне тайги. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал, 6, 24–30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HYOHHP

Cieszewski, C. J. (2004). GADA derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes from Richards, Weibull and other exponential functions. В: International Conference on Forest Measurements and Qualitative Methods and Management (pp. 248–261). Athens, USA: University of Georgia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255564510_GADA_derivation_of_dynamic_site_equations_with_polymorphism_and_variable_asymptotes_from_Richards_Weibull_and_other_exponential_functions

Demidova, N. A., Durkina, T. M., Gogoleva, L. G., & Paramonov, A. A. (2020). Lodgepole pine of Yukon origin in the European North of Russia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 574, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/574/1/012022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SYQQSZ

Heiðarsson, L., Pukkala, T., & Snorrason, A. (2023). Individual tree growth models for lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in Iceland. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 36, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.16886/IAS.2023.07. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YQZFEH

Jansons, A., Sisenis, L., Neimane, U., & Rieksts Riekstins, J. (2013). Biomass production of young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) stands in Latvia. iForest, 6, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0637-006

Liziniewicz, M., Ekö, P. M., & Agestam, E. (2011). Effect of spacing on 23 year old lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia) in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.639798

Sobolev, A., Feklistov, P., Bolotov, I., & Barzut, O. (2022). The results of the introduction of twisted pine (Pinus contorta) in Bolshoy Solovetsky Island. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A — Forestry, 64(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2022-0001. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LSJANC

Sullivan, T. P., Sullivan, D. S., Lindgren, P. M. F., Ransome, D. B., & Zabek, L. (2020). Twenty five years after stand thinning and repeated fertilization in lodgepole pine forest: Implications for tree growth, stand structure, and carbon sequestration. Forests, 11, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030337. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EUZBMZ

Taylor, K. T., Maxwell, B. D., Pauchard, A., Nuñez, M. A., & Rew, L. J. (2016). Native versus non native invasions: Similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges. Diversity and Distributions, 22, 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12419. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XPBSTN

Vacek, S., Vacek, Z., Cukor, L., Podrázský, V., & Gallo, J. (2022). Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon and climate change: A literature review of opportunities, challenges, and risks in European forests. Journal of Forest Science, 68(9), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.17221/101/2022 JFS. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SPQCRK

Wasowicz, P., Óskarsdóttir, G., & Þórhallsdóttir, Þ. E. (2025). Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) invasion in subarctic Iceland: Evidence from a long term study. NeoBiota, 97, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.97.134047. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RJKXJT

Zhigunov, A., & Butenko, O. (2019). Estimating the growth of 20 to 26 year old lodgepole pine plantations in the Leningrad region of Russia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A — Forestry, 61(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2019-0006. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMZNTA

References

Alekseev, V. M. (2009). Analysis of the prospects of various coniferous species of introduced plants in forestry production. Izvestia Sankt Peterburgskoi Lesotekhnicheskoi Akademii, 186, 24–30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LJNHJP

Alekseev, V. M., Zhigunov, A. V., Bondarenko, A. S., & Burtsev, D. S. (2014). Introduction of lodgepole pine in the Leningrad Region. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Forestry Journal), 3(339), 24–33. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEEOHR

Babich, N. A., & Andronova, M. M. (2014). Lodgepole pine — a promising introduced species for landscaping small northern cities. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Forestry Journal), 6(342), 155–160. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TALVRV

Gutiy, A. L. (2016). State and growth of experimental lodgepole pine plantations in the Komi Republic. Lesovedenie (Forest Science), 4, 265–269. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WKDYUF

Demidova, N. A., Durkina, T. M., & Gogoleva, L. G. (2017). Seed production of lodgepole pine, broad needled variety (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm. ex Wats) in the Arkhangelsk Region. Lesokhozyaystvennaya Informatsiya (Forestry Information), 2, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2017.2.07. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHVAPF

Demidova, N. A., Durkina, T. M., Gogoleva, L. G., Bykov, Y. S., & Paramonov, A. A. (2017). Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Loud. var. latifolia S. Wats.) in the Storozhevskoe forest district of the Komi Republic. Lesokhozyaystvennaya Informatsiya (Forestry Information), 1, 24–33. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YIFEUX

Denisova, N. B., Lebedev, A. V., Volkov, S. N., Belov, D. A., & Kozlov, K. A. (2025). Sanitary and forest pathology state of Pinus brutia var. pityusa (Steven) Silba in the Dzhankhot pine forest. Prirodoobustroystvo (Environmental Engineering), 2, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-2-137-144. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KAZZWU

Drozdov, I. I., & Drozdov, Y. I. (2005). Lodgepole pine plantations as a solution to the raw material problem of pulpwood. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Lesa — Lesnoy Vestnik (Bulletin of Moscow State Forest University — Forestry Bulletin), 5, 83–84. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JSHJTH

Drozdov, Y. I. (2008). Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) at the experimental sites of MSFU. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Lesa — Lesnoy Vestnik (Bulletin of Moscow State Forest University — Forestry Bulletin), 1, 188–191. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ISCIRB

Korchagov, S. A., & Khamitov, R. S. (2020). Experience in growing lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in the Vologda Region. Lesnoy Vestnik. Forestry Bulletin, 24(3), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2020-3-60-65. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EWIVGT

Lebedev, A. V. (2023). Inventory of tree plantations in urbanized areas using a smartphone. Lesotekhnicheskiy Zhurnal (Journal of Forestry Engineering), 3(51), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2023.3/5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HBYIOC

Melekhov, I. S. (1984). Introduction of conifers in forestry. Lesovedenie (Forest Science), 6, 72–78. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZYMGIZ

Pristova, T. A., Fedorkov, A. L., & Novakovsky, A. B. (2023). Aboveground phytomass of the stand in experimental lodgepole pine plantations in the Syktyvkar forest district of the Komi Republic. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Forestry Journal), 6(396), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-6-31-43. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XWIDOD

Raevsky, B. V., & Mordas, A. A. (2000). Growth and productivity of test plantations of lodgepole pine in southern Karelia. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Forestry Journal), 5–6, 74–81. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJYEEP

Raevsky, B. V. (2010). Growth dynamics of mixed plantations of lodgepole pine and Scots pine in southern Karelia. Proceedings of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1(1), 31–38. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NCOGFT

Fedorkov, A. L., & Gutiy, L. N. (2017). State of experimental lodgepole pine plantations in the Komi Republic. Bulletin of the Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2(200), 25–31. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZTUTSD

Feklistov, P. A., & Biryukov, S. Y. (2006). Seasonal growth of lodgepole pine in the northern taiga subzone. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Forestry Journal), 6, 24–30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HYOHHP

Cieszewski, C. J. (2004). GADA derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes from Richards, Weibull and other exponential functions. In International Conference on Forest Measurements and Qualitative Methods and Management (pp. 248–261). Athens, USA: University of Georgia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255564510_GADA_derivation_of_dynamic_site_equations_with_polymorphism_and_variable_asymptotes_from_Richards_Weibull_and_other_exponential_functions

Demidova, N. A., Durkina, T. M., Gogoleva, L. G., & Paramonov, A. A. (2020). Lodgepole pine of Yukon origin in the European North of Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 574, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/574/1/012022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SYQQSZ

Heiðarsson, L., Pukkala, T., & Snorrason, A. (2023). Individual tree growth models for lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in Iceland. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 36, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.16886/IAS.2023.07. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YQZFEH

Jansons, A., Sisenis, L., Neimane, U., & Rieksts Riekstins, J. (2013). Biomass production of young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) stands in Latvia. iForest, 6, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0637-006

Liziniewicz, M., Ekö, P. M., & Agestam, E. (2011). Effect of spacing on 23 year old lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia) in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.639798

Sobolev, A., Feklistov, P., Bolotov, I., & Barzut, O. (2022). The results of the introduction of twisted pine (Pinus contorta) on Bolshoy Solovetsky Island. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A — Forestry, 64(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2022-0001. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LSJANC

Sullivan, T. P., Sullivan, D. S., Lindgren, P. M. F., Ransome, D. B., & Zabek, L. (2020). Twenty five years after stand thinning and repeated fertilization in lodgepole pine forest: Implications for tree growth, stand structure, and carbon sequestration. Forests, 11, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030337. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EUZBMZ

Taylor, K. T., Maxwell, B. D., Pauchard, A., Nuñez, M. A., & Rew, L. J. (2016). Native versus non native invasions: Similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges. Diversity and Distributions, 22, 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12419. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XPBSTN

Vacek, S., Vacek, Z., Cukor, L., Podrázský, V., & Gallo, J. (2022). Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon and climate change: A literature review of opportunities, challenges, and risks in European forests. Journal of Forest Science, 68(9), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.17221/101/2022 JFS. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SPQCRK

Wasowicz, P., Óskarsdóttir, G., & Þórhallsdóttir, Þ. E. (2025). Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) invasion in subarctic Iceland: Evidence from a long term study. NeoBiota, 97, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.97.134047. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RJKXJT

Zhigunov, A., & Butenko, O. (2019). Estimating the growth of 20 to 26 year old lodgepole pine plantations in the Leningrad region of Russia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A — Forestry, 61(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2019-0006. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMZNTA


Published
2026-02-28
How to Cite
Lebedev, A., Khamitov, R., & Khamitova, S. (2026). Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) plantations in forest conditions of the north-east of Moscow region. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 18(1), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2026-18-1-1403
Section
Horticulture and Forestry